🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that indecision on how best to address the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Along the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His parent said she lost sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

The lack of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to weigh all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the right answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in life after death, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.